It's been awhile since we had a legit post around here (yes, I'm looking at
you and
you), so I went back into my photo archive and found a real honest-to-goodness, Minneapolis, paint-on-brick, from back in the day, aging-but-preserved ghost sign for you. You can thank me later.
The signs, for stores, factory, storage and warehouse space, may tell us something about the industrial history of
the building, or it could just be Andrews Inc advertising for what they can offer nearby. But regardless, this was once a commercial building downtown, so it must still be in commercial use, right? No, of course not, silly. It's "
lofts" now! What could be better?
Well, for the Sexton, perhaps lots of things could have been better. It seems to have had rather a rough conversion into hip, urban living space. Everyone involved seems to have
sued each other, and residents were apparently promised a parking ramp (that's garage, if you don't speak Minnesotan) that never materialized. I could probably make this whole post out of the
saga of the Sexton suits, but that seems snore-inducing, so I'm going to write about other stuff after this next picture:
So, as I often do, I've tried to find some of the actual history on the building, before its troubled condo conversion, but I've not found a lot. This guy
seemed to promise to tell me something about it, but when you strip out the stuff from 2007 & 2008, he really just says it was an old warehouse. Yeah, we knew that.
Here's what I've got for actual history: a photo of the building
looking sharp in 1924, another showing
cobbled streets in front from the next year, and two from 1938
inside the building depicting what's described as a "
hospital admissions project." At least these tell us something about the age of the building. Now. Are you ready for a tangent or two?
I knew you were. Okay. So having found little about the building itself, I got curious about its namesake. There must have been someone named Sexton around, right? It seems there were at least two fellows with that name who popped up right away in my searches. The first is a true Twin Cities old timer.
Gus Sexton was lumberjack and logging camp operator along the St. Croix dating back to the 1870s who seemed to get his
picture taken fairly
regularly. He also seems to have
given money for a pipe organ at St. Michael's church and
owned property in Stillwater. Unfortunately, we all know the good citizen's of Minneapolis wouldn't allow a foreigner from the east side of the river to own a building on our glorious soil, so Gus probably isn't our guy.
A more likely suspect might be this fellow,
Charles W. Sexton, pictured in 1919. It seems he was in the insurance game, if he's the guy mentioned in
Best's Insurance Reports in 1922, but it also seems that he didn't live terribly long after that picture was taken, as Best's says he was deceased at the time of its report.
William Gray Purcell seems to have
written to his company to make a claim in 1915. He was apparently also a lawyer and his daughter seems to have
married a lawyer, so maybe it's best not to speak of him anymore.